![]() |
| Mother Shipton and Cardinal Wolsey
On a dark and stormy night in 1488 a young woman lay in a
dark cave on the banks of the River Nidd in Knaresborough in North Yorkshire struggling
to give birth to her illegitimate daughter.
As the rain lashed down and the lightning crackled across the sky, Agnes
Sontheil laboured through the night until her baby was born. The young mother called her infant daughter
Ursula and the cave was to be their home for the next two years. Eventually, after the Abbott of Beverley
brought pressure to bear, the small child was removed from her mother and the
cave, and placed in the care of a respectable local family. When Ursula
Sontheil grew up she married a carpenter from the city of York called Tom
Shipton in 1512.
Ursula Shipton, or Mother Shipton as she became known as,
started a career of telling fortunes and creating prophetic poems. The local people, who were very wary and
superstitious, believed that she was a witch.
This belief was reinforced by her appearances, because by many accounts MotherShipton was disfigured and deformed, unable to walk without the aid of a stick
and with a large hooked nose on her terrifyingly ugly face. She was so taunted and bullied by her
neighbours that she began spending most of her time back in the cave where she
had been born, wandering in the local woods looking for the herbs and healing
plants that she used in her remedies and potions.
Mother Shipton lived during the reign of the Tudor King
Henry VIII, and she confirmed her reputation as an incredibly accurate
soothsayer when she made a prediction concerning Cardinal Wolsey, Henry’s
powerful Lord Chancellor and Archbishop of York. Cardinal Wolsey’s influence over Henry VIII
was on the wane when she made a prophecy that he would never get to see York in
his lifetime, even though he was the appointed Archbishop of that city. The mighty statesman was, not surprisingly,
unimpressed with this prediction, and moved swiftly to prove Mother Shipton
wrong. He sent three Lords from his
retinue to remonstrate with her and to get her to withdraw what she had said,
but she merely laughed in their faces.
Even when they threatened to have her burned at the stake as a witch
unless she kept her mouth shut, she did not back down and just repeated her
prediction that the great Cardinal would never set his eyes on the city of
York.
This intransigence so incensed Cardinal Wolsey that he
immediately set out to travel to York. He
reached a place called Cawood Tower, some ten miles south of the city, when his
travelling party was forced to stop for the night. Determined to get his first sight of the
city, the Cardinal made to climb the tower, but before he could do it he was
arrested by the King’s men on a charge of high treason. The accuracy of this prophecy struck fear
into the hearts of many, and she was now feared as well as reviled.
Mother Shipton reputedly lived until 1561, which would have
made her an elderly lady of 73 when she died. During her life she had spoken
her predictions, not written them, and it wasn’t until around 1641 that the
first book recording her prophecies was produced. This book was put together by a lady called
Joanne Waller who compiled it just before she died at the age of 94. She claimed that she had heard the
predictions directly from Mother Shipton herself, so she must have been talking
to the famous soothsayer in the last few years of her life.
Since this first publication of Mother Shipton’s prophecies,
there have been over fifty other editions of her sayings. With many of these predictions, it is very
questionable as to how many of them were ever uttered by Mother Shipton, or
were made up in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. One of the most famous was her supposed
prediction about the end of the world coming in 1881, but as we are still here
over a hundred years later this one, thankfully, did not come true. Various other dates were quoted in different
publications and in different countries, but probably none of them came from
the lips of Mother Shipton. Other famous
predictions were the Civil War in England, the coming of iron ships and Samuel
Pepys wrote in his famous diary that while they were surveying the damage
wrought by the Great Fire of London that he had overheard people talking about Mother
Shipton prophesying the fiery conflagration.
Of course the reality is that we do not even really know if
Mother Shipton was an historical figure or just a local legend. The cave where
she was born, and brewed her healing potions is now a major tourist attraction
in Knaresborough called Mother Shipton’s Caves.
The caves also feature a local curiosity called the Petrifying
Well. Since the Middle Ages people have
hung objects in the waters of the Petrifying Well and returned a couple of
months later to find that they have been turned to stone. In earlier times it would be dead animals and
birds and things like wigs that would be left in the well, but these days teddy
bears are hung in the water, and once they have petrified they are sold in the
Gift Shop. The Petrifying Well is fed
from the waters of the Petrifying Well Spring, which in turn is fed through an
aquifer from a natural underground lake.
As the water travels through the aquifer it dissolves a very high
concentration of minerals from the surrounding rocks, and it is this high mineral
concentration in the spring water that turns things into stone if they are left
immersed long enough. In past centuries
people would bring the sick and infirm to the Petrifying Well to drink the
waters and bathe so that they would be healed, but these days you cannot drink
the water as the high mineral content renders it not suitable. Another feature
of Mother Shipton’s Caves is the Wishing Well, where apparently many of the
wishes made have really come true.
So do you believe that some people can see into the future
and that the prophecies of Mother Shipton were true? If so, maybe you should
visit Mother Shipton’s Cave, make a wish at the Wishing Well and buy a teddy
that was turned to stone in the Petrifying Well.
Mother Shipton image Wikimedia Commons Public Domain
Mother Shipton's Cave Chris Wikimedia Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
|
Worlds of Fascination
Do you find the world a fascinating place? How many worlds are there out there? There are so many fascinating things going on in the world, so many facts to learn, and so many things to intrigue us. So join my Worlds of Fascination for a diverse and eclectic round up of facts, news and articles on everything from the profund issues of life right through to trivial, but fascinating bits of information!
Saturday, 18 February 2012
Who Was Mother Shipton?
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
UK Invasive Species – War of the Grey and Black Squirrels
In the UK there are several very common and familiar animal,
insect and plant species that are not actually native to our country. They are species that have been introduced into
our countryside in one way or another, and have often driven our native species
from their habitats by out-competing them for food, passing on disease and
taking over territory. Invasive species
can be very destructive to often fragile habitats, and can cost the economy
millions of pounds a year. In fact, you may well have one of these alien
animals in your garden right now, and you may have spent many happy hours
watching their antics and admiring their aerial acrobatics in the trees. This cute little invader is the grey
squirrel, and although they seem so ubiquitous they have only been scampering
around our gardens and woodlands for the last hundred years or so.
Our native squirrel species is the smaller red squirrel, and
before the last quarter of the 19th century they numbered in the
millions and ranged across the whole country. Red squirrels are easily
recognisable by their striking red coats, bushy tails and tufts of red fur on
their ears. Their preferred habitat is conifer forest, where they live off pine
cones, seeds, shoots and fruit. The red
squirrel tends to be a solitary animal except during the mating season, when they
build large nests called dreys in the forks of trees producing a litter of between
2-3 kittens in the spring. However, it
is now estimated that there are as few as 120,000 red squirrels left in the
wild, and the major cause of their decline was the introduction of grey
squirrels into the UK.
The grey squirrel is a North American species, which arrived
in the UK between 1876 and 1929 when they were introduced into many parks and
private animal collections. Inevitably
some of the animals escaped or were released into the wild, where they thrived
and bred successfully. Because they were
so much bigger, stronger and ate a wider variety of food than the native reds,
they started to drive them out of their territory, so that now the red squirrel
is confined to parts of Scotland, northern England, Wales and the Isle of
Wight. The grey squirrels also passed on
disease to the reds, which they had no natural immunity to.
But although the grey squirrels have been the victorious conquerors
of our gardens and parks for decades now, they do have a new challenger that is
beginning to drive them out of their territory and ironically this new invasive
species is a member of their own family.
So don’t go and get your eyes tested if the squirrel running down your
fence looks black and not grey, as the black squirrel is slowly but surely
increasing its numbers in some parts of Britain.
Like its grey cousin, the black
squirrel also arrived from the US in the late 19th century,
where they were kept as exotic pets in a private zoo in Bedfordshire. Some of these animals escaped from captivity,
and in 1912 the first wild black squirrel was spotted in the environs of Letchworth,
Hertfordshire. It is now estimated that
there are more than 25,000 of them living in the UK, most of which are in the
East Anglia region, and some scientists think that they could eventually become
the dominant squirrel species in this country as there are more sightings of
black squirrels being reported from other parts of the UK.
Black squirrel image Sujit kumar Wikimedia Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 2.0 Generic
Saturday, 28 January 2012
The Enigma of the Indonesian Hobbits
Every so often a discovery is made that rocks the
archaeological world to its core. One of these amazing discoveries was the uncovering
of a strange, diminutive hominid skeleton on the island of Flores in Indonesia.
Nicknamed the ‘Hobbit’, the remains of the this new dwarf species of human was
discovered in 2003 in the vast limestone caves at Liang Bua Cave by a joint
Australian-Indonesian team led by Mike Morwood from Australia’s Wollongong
University. At the time, Morwood’s team were investigating whether there was
any evidence for the migration of H. erectus, an early human species, from Asia
to Australia and were very surprised to come across a brand new species of
early human. This new species was named H. Floresiensis, and from the start
these ancient human remains have been the cause of much speculations,
disagreement and debate among the scientific community.
![]() |
| H. floresiensis Skull |
To date, partial skeletons of nine individuals have been
unearthed including one complete skull.
The most complete skeleton is known as LB1, and by the pelvis is judged
to be a female who was around the age of thirty when she died. Because of the very damp conditions in the
Liang Bua caves and the relatively recent age of the remains, the skeleton had
not been fossilised and the bones were in a very fragile condition when they
were found. The ‘hobbit’ remains are remarkable for several reasons. The single
most surprising thing is their small stature; they stood only about 1 metre
tall and were fully bipedal. They also had a very small brain size, around
417cc. This brain size is smaller than
the brain size range of chimpanzees, which is between 300 to 500cc, and also
those of the Australopithecines, who were a species of very early human. These ‘hobbits’
had human like teeth, but had a receding forehead and no chin. The bone
structure of the wrists, shoulders and arms are also proved to be more similar
to those of chimpanzees and Australopithecines than modern humans or H. erectus
in a 2007 study.
So how old were these remarkable skeletal remains of a new
species of dwarf human? The fossil skeletons range from being between 38,000
and 18,000 years old, but other archaeological evidence such as stone tools
suggests that H. floresiensis inhabited the island of Flores from as long ago
as 95,000 years ago and up to as recently as 13,000 years ago. This makes the
‘Hobbits’ the last-known surviving non-modern humans in the world, as the
Neanderthals had last walked the earth about 35,000 years ago. As modern humans
arrived on Flores between 55,000 and 35,000 years ago, these two very different
species of human would have presumably shared territory and interacted with
each other for thousands of years, although there is no archaeological proof of
this.
There are theories that the ‘hobbits’ survived until much
more recently and could even still be alive today, deep in the unexplored
tropical rainforests of Indonesia.
Folklore on Flores speaks of a strange creature called Ebu Gogo who were
small, human-like cave-dwellers who did not communicate and walked with a
strange gait. Reputedly they were covered in hair and had broad faces and large
mouths. The Ebu Gogo were known for stealing human crops and kidnapping
children, so the legend goes that sometime in the 18th century the
Flores Islanders tricked the Ebu Gogo into accepting gifts of rattan mats. As they returned to their caves with these
mats, the Flores Islanders followed them and set fire to the mats killing
nearly all of the Ebu Gogo, except perhaps for one couple who escaped to
continue on the Ebu Gogo line. Also, on
the Indonesian island of Sumatra, deep in the jungle, sightings are still
reported of a 1.5 metre high hominid the locals call Orang Pendek, which is
Indonesian for short person. But why
would H. floresiensis suddenly die out 12,000 years ago after surviving
successfully for so many thousands of years?
It is thought that a volcanic eruption in the region 12,000 years ago
could have been responsible for the demise of the ‘Hobbits’, the same eruption
that led to the extinction of the pygmy elephant Stegodon on Flores.
H. floresiensis was an unexpected discovery and it was a big
surprise that a non-modern human species existed on the earth until so recently
and was so small in stature, but what other controversy did the discovery of
the ‘Hobbits’ cause. Well, the big
debate is where they came from and how they evolved. Some experts believe that they
were a direct descendant of H. erectus, and that for some reason there had been
active selection for smaller brain size and stature. So did the ‘Hobbits’
shrink over thousands of years because of the evolutionary pressures caused by being
on an island with limited resources? Don’t forget that Flores had also been
home to a species of dwarf elephants that had adapted to their environment and
shrunk, and these dwarf elephants had been an important food source for the ‘hobbits’.
However, the study of the H. floresiensis
wrist bones showed them to be nothing like H. erectus carpal bones, as the ‘hobbit’
wrist bones lack features that had been present in early species of modern
humans from at least 800,000 years ago. If H. Floresiensis were a dwarf
variation of these earlier humans, it challenges the traditional view that H.
erectus could not cross sea barriers.
The island of Flores has always been separated from its neighbour Java
by a deep sea barrier, so if H. erectus was living on Flores, and in 1998 Mike
Morwood announced the discovery of stone tools believed to have been made by these
early humans dating back 840,000 years, then this theory is totally overturned
and they were indeed capable of travelling by sea.
However, an even more daring theory is that the ‘hobbits’
evolved directly from Australopithecines, who were some of our very earliest
human ancestors. Australopithecus first
emerged around seven million years ago in the Rift Valley of East Africa, and
australopithecine fossils show great similarities to the remains of the
‘Hobbits’, including small brain size, small stature and primitive wrist bones,
teeth and feet. This would mean that H. floresiensis did not shrink due to
environmental pressures, but started off small and stayed small. But the most startling aspect of this theory
is that Australopithecus was not previously thought to have ever left
Africa. The first modern human migration
from Africa was believed to have occurred around 65,000 years ago, with small
bands of our early ancestors migrating out of Africa via the coastal routes
through the Middle East and maybe making the short sea crossing to Arabia. If the ‘hobbits’ were descended from
Australopithecus it meant that Australopithecines possessed hitherto
undiscovered seafaring abilities and also that they possibly migrated out of
Africa into Asia millions of years
before any species of human was thought to have done? Mike Morwood has now
uncovered stone tools on nearby Sulawesi that could be almost 2 million years
old, so will more H. floresiensis skeletons and archaeological artefacts be discovered
that could provide further vital evidence?
There are some experts who argue that the controversial ‘hobbit’
remains are just modern human skeletons that are somehow abnormal and that the
individuals suffered from a disease such as microcephaly that leads to small
brain sizes. However, all of the ‘hobbit’
skeletons display the same features and that they are just too different from
modern humans to simply be diseased modern humans. What might be able to settle the argument is
if some mitochondrial DNA is recovered from the H. floresiensis specimens and
sent for analysis. However the hot, damp
climate of the Liang Bua caves reduces the chances of it being recovered, as
extreme heat degrades DNA. In addition,
the bones were not fossilised, which also does not help DNA recovery.
Hopefully, future discoveries will throw further light on
where the ‘hobbits’ came from and how they evolved. Also, they may give us more
information on when the first humans really did leave Africa to spread to other
parts of the world. Of course, the most amazing thing would be if a population
of diminutive ‘hobbits’ were discovered to be still living today deep in the
tropical jungles of Indonesia, and then suddenly we would not be the only human
species alive on our planet today.
H. floresiensis skull image FunkMonk Wikimedia Commons Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 2.0 Generic
H. floresiensis skull image FunkMonk Wikimedia Commons Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 2.0 Generic
Labels:
dwarf human species,
early man,
Flores,
H. floresiensis,
Indonesian hobbit,
new human species,
prehistoric man
| Reactions: |
Thursday, 26 January 2012
Is There A Wild Big Cat Roaming The Cotswolds?
The UK doesn’t have any very large native big cat species, but
over the past few weeks there has been a spate of mutilated animal carcasses
found across the Cotswolds. Our largest native cat is the ScottishWildcat, which is now unfortunately a very rare and reclusive species, with
only around four hundred still remaining in the more remote areas of the
Scottish Highlands. So what creature is
it that has now killed several deer and three wallabies in the rolling English
countryside, where the largest local native predator is the fox?
This mysterious creature has been dubbed the ‘Wildcat ofWoodchester’ and there have dozens of reported sightings. The terrain around this area is very rugged,
with wooded ravines and heavy undergrowth, where a large feline predator could
easily hide and be very difficult to spot.
Between 2005 and 2011 Gloucestershire police received seventy five
different reports of alleged big cat sightings that ranged from glimpses of pumas,
panthers and even a lion close to junction 9 on the M5.
The first mutilated deer carcass was found by someone
walking their dog on January 4th, and when the corpse was examined there
was plenty of evidence that it was a big cat kill, rather than a dog
attack. The nose of the animal has been
bitten off, which is a sign of a cat attack as they sometimes suffocate their
prey, and also the deer’s innards had been cleanly removed and placed by the
body. Because the deer had been so
recently killed and the corpse was unlikely to have been scavenged by any other
animals, samples were removed to be tested for DNA and the results are due in
the next few days. Hopefully the DNA
testing will prove to have been successful and whatever animal it was that
killed the deer will be identified.
Two more mutilated deer carcasses have been found in the
last couple of weeks, and in the last couple of days three wallabies have been
found dead in their enclosure at a private wildlife collection only twelve
miles from where the deer were devoured in Woodchester. The animals that killed the unfortunate
wallabies had to jump a 7ft fence to get into their paddock, showing that it is
a very powerful creature, and the dead wallabies were found to have puncture
wounds in their necks, their bodies completely devoured and their internal organs
placed alongside what remained of them.
Many locals believe that big cats have been on the loose in
the area for many years, and that their prescence might go back to the 1970’s
when it became illegal to own exotic big cats and many were thought to have
been released into the wild by their owners.
But if it is found that there is a big cat population roaming
Gloucestershire, is there any danger to people?
This is very unlikely as big cats generally avoid people where they can
and there have not been any reported incidents of an alien big cat attacking a
human in the UK. In the Cotswolds there
is a plentiful supply of wildlife, such as deer, for them to hunt, so the
danger to people is minimal. The big
danger is that if the DNA tests do come back positive or there is an identified
sighting that fear will drive a campaign to hunt them down and kill them. Although these leopards, pumas or lynxes are
an invasive species in the United Kingdom, it is likely that they have been
quietly living and breeding here for many years, with no danger to humans or the
local habitat. So if we do have a
population of beautiful big cats breeding in this country, would it not be
better to protect them and learn about them rather than destroy them?
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
Where Is The Lost Amber Room?
Throughout history there have been many lost treasures. Some have been miraculously found like the
gold treasure of Troy unearthed by Heinrich Schliemann and some remain lost in
the sands of time, perhaps still awaiting discovery. One such lost treasure that has not yet been
found again is the Amber Room, which is believed to be worth at least £150
million in today’s money. What makes the
disappearance of the Amber Room so unusual is that it was a whole dismantled
room that was lost and that it vanished fairly recently at the end of the
Second World War. So this was no ancient
mystery, where there are only a few tantalising clues or documents and
sometimes even the existence of the treasure is disputed. The existence of the Amber Room is
historically well documented and photographed, and we know that it was the
Nazis who looted the Amber Room during World War II and removed it from
Russia. But it is what happened to the
Amber Room after the fall of the Nazis in 1945 that is so intriguing and so
mysterious, for the whereabouts of the Amber Room has been lost despite all of
the attempts to find it.
![]() |
| The Amber Room, Catherine Palace |
History of the Amber Room
Amber is an organic gemstone made from tree resin that was
fossilized millions of years ago. Amber
ranges in colour from warm yellows to rich tawny browns and is widely used in
jewelry and decoration. However, to
create an entire large room lined with precious amber panels backed with gold
leaf and encrusted with gemstones was a hugely ambitious and creative
endeavour. When it was completed the Amber Room comprised of more than 55
square metres of amber that weighed over six tonnes. The beginning of the Amber
Room was in 1701 when Andreas Schluter, a German sculptor, created the concept
of the Amber Room for the Prussian King Friedrich I. It was constructed in
Friedrich’s Charlottenburg Palace by Gottfried Wolfram. The Russian Czar Peter
the Great visited the Charlottenburg Palace a few years after the installation
of the Amber Room and greatly admired it, so in 1716 Friedrich I’s son, King
Friedrich Wilhelm I, gave it to the Czar to cement a Prussian-Russian
alliance. The Amber Room was installed
in the Winter Palace in St Petersburg, Russia in 1755 and subsequently moved to
the Catherine Palace at Tsarskoye Selo. The new design of the Amber Room was
conceived by Bartolomeo Rastrelli, court architect to Czarina Elizabeth of
Russia and Frederick the Great sent further supplies of amber to complete the
ambitious design.
What Happened to the Amber Room During World War II?
When the Nazis invaded Russia in 1941, those who were
responsible for the treasures in the Russian palaces and museums made valiant
attempt to hide what they could, but when they attempted to remove the Amber
Room from the Catherine Palace they found that the amber covering on the walls
had become too brittle and fragile to move.
Their solution was to wallpaper over the amber in the hope that the Nazi
invaders would not realise that the amber was there, but the Amber Room was
such an iconic, well known world treasure that this measure proved futile. The Nazi soldiers found and disassembled the
Amber Room within a very short time of taking over the Catherine Palace, and
shipped the precious sheets of amber into crates and shipped them off to
Konigsberg in East Prussia. It was housed in Konigsberg Castle and parts of the
Amber room were put on display.
What Happened to the Amber Room When the Second World War
Ended?
It is the mystery of what happened to the Amber Room in the
confused, chaotic last year of World War II that no one has ever really solved. Was the Amber Room removed from Konigsberg
Castle or was it hidden away somewhere in a vault within the ancient castle or
in the town? There were reports that crates large enough to contain the sheets
of amber were seen at Konigsberg railway station early in 1945, and there have
been rumours that the Amber Room was hidden away in a disused mine. There was
also a rumour that the Amber Room was put on board the ship MV Wilhelm Gustloff
during Operation Hannibal, when the ship was being used to evacuate military
personnel and civilians from Gotenhafen to Kiel who had been trapped by the
oncoming Red Army. Unfortunately, the MV
Wilhelm Gustloff was torpedoed by a Russian submarine and sunk, with the tragic
loss of over 9,000 souls. So if the Amber Room had been evacuated on this ship
it is now at the bottom of the sea, and as the site of the wreck has been
designated as a war memorial, it will never be open for exploration or salvage.
At the very end of the war, the British Royal Air Force extensively bombed
Konigsberg. Including the castle, so there is also the possibility that the
Amber Room was destroyed during this bombing campaign or in the ensuing ground
assaults.
Hunting For the Amber Room
The mysterious disappearance of the Amber Room has
inevitably produced many groups of people who have hunted for the treasure, and
some have even claimed to have found it, although none of the amber has ever
been recovered. One of the most recent
claims in 2008 that the Amber Room has been discovered comes from Deutschneudorf in the Ore Mountain area of South East Germany. A team of treasure hunters located an underground
man-made cavern which they believed contained the Amber Room, and
electromagnetic pulse measurements showed that the cavern also possibly
contained over two tonnes of gold. There
had been eye-witness reports that the Nazis had brought trains and trucks full
of treasures, artwork and valuable goods into the area in the spring of 1945,
although they had never been found again when the hostilities ended. However,
the digging was halted, and no conclusive proof of the presence of the Amber
Room in Deutschneudorf has ever been presented.
In January 2010 a Russian treasure
hunter called Sergei Trifonov reported that he has found a World War II bunker
that had been used by the German High Command in Konigsberg during 1945 that he
believes may contain the fabled Amber Room. The bunker is situated around 1,000 metres from
Konigsberg Castle, which was demolished in 1967, where it is believed that the
Amber Room was housed during the course of World War II, and excavations have
already uncovered a brick lined room.
Only time and further excavations will
prove whether or not the Amber Room was hidden in either Deutschneudorf or
Konigsberg. If it is ever found again,
the amber panels and precious metal decoration of the Amber Room will need
careful restoration, or maybe will even be so badly damaged that it could never
again be recreated in the Russian palace. However, if you do want to see what
the Amber Room would have looked like, you can go and visit a recreation of the
Amber Room that was completed in 2003 at the Catherine Palace Museum just
outside St Petersburg. It is to be hoped that the Amber Room will be found one
day, and not like so many of the world’s treasures lost forever, so once more
we can marvel at this incredibly crafted Baroque masterpiece.
Amber Room Image Stan Shebs Wikimedia Commons Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Amber Room Image Stan Shebs Wikimedia Commons Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Labels:
Amber Room,
Amber room mystery,
Catherine Palace,
Lost Amber Room,
Nazi Looters,
The Amber Room,
treasure hunters
| Reactions: |
Invasive Red Fire Ants in the USA
Introduced Red Fire Ants – Relentless Invaders
Did you know that the southern parts of the United States
are being invaded by a relentless enemy? This diminutive foe started arriving
from South America during the 1930s and has left a trail of destruction
wherever they have colonised ever since, and now they also seem to be moving on
towards world domination. This successful invader is the red fire ant, and fear
of this small insect is leaving some parks, gardens and camping grounds in
affected areas of the US unused and empty. The red fire ant arrived in the
United States by hitching a lift in ships ballast, and so is an accidental
invasive species, unlike some introduced species, such as the cane toad in
Australia, that were deliberately released in a country for a purpose such as
pest control. The introduced red fire ant has also already caused millions of
dollars of damage to crops, property and vital infrastructure, and are proving
very difficult to eradicate.
| Queen Red Fire Ant |
What Are Red Fire Ants?
Red fire ants, or Solenopsis invicta, are native to Brazil
in South America. The southern US does have its own two native species of fire
ant, the southern fire ant and the fire ant, but it is the introduced fire ants
that are causing most of the damage and environmental problems. There is
another invasive species of fire ant, the black fire ant, which is only as yet only
found in Alabama and northern Mississippi, but some experts believe that they
could be just the same species as the red fire ant as they are so similar.
Introduced fire ants live in colonies, and they build large above-ground nests
which can have extensive networks of interconnected underground galleries. The
red fire ants build these nest mounds in sunny spots in gardens, parks and
fields, and they are rarely to be found in shady areas or dense forest. One of
the reasons that introduced red fire ants can grow in numbers so rapidly is
that the ants build their nests so that they can control the temperature and
humidity inside them. This means that
the ants can keep the temperature in the nest high enough to keep on
reproducing, even during the colder weather of the winter season. This rapid
expansion of the red fire ant population has seen them spread like wildfire
through suitable habitat across the south eastern United States and into
western Texas.
What Damage Do Introduced Red Fire Ants Cause?
Red fire ants are very destructive and are costing the US
millions of dollars in damage repair. They cause real problems for farmers, as
their nest mounds can make ploughing fields and sowing crops very difficult.
The red fire ants also feed directly on crops such as strawberries, potatoes,
okra, corn and soybeans and their presence can also protect some other insect
pest species. However, on a more positive note, they feed on some other pests
such as cockroaches, ticks, boll weevils and sugarcane borers. The lone star tick is regarded as a major
livestock pest by farmers, and the red fire ant has been credited with
significantly reducing its range. Red fire ants are also bad news for citrus
fruit trees, as they chew on the bark and damage it and also feed on the fruit
and the growing tips. Red fire ants also cause major problems and damage in
homes and commercial properties. The introduced fire ants can get into homes
and build nests in wall cavities, under flooring and carpets and around the
plumbing. One of the strangest things about the red fire ants is that they seem
to be attracted to electrical fields, and so they swarm into electrical
appliances, chewing wires and causing damage. The especial love of red fire
ants is microwave ovens, and they even seem to be able to survive the high
temperatures when the appliances are switched on. They also get into outdoor
electrical equipment, sometimes with the potential to cause dangerous
accidents, as they can infest traffic signal control boxes or electric metres
on properties. Scarily, they have even been found in the lights on airport
runways. Even major infrastructure can be destroyed by these ants, as sections
of road have collapsed due to the red fire ants removing soil from under the
asphalt to build their nests.
![]() |
| Red Fire Ant Distribution Map USA |
So Why Are People So Scared of Red Fire Ants?
An individual red fire ant sting is not that painful, and is
probably not even as painful as the sting of a wasp or a bee. They sting like a wasp, by injecting a
stinger into your skin, and the red fire ant’s sting initially causes a burning
feeling. This burning sensation gives
way to small, itching pustules on the skin. Sometimes these pustules can become
infected if they are broken, which can cause scars that take a few months to
fade. In some severe cases, there are people who have had to undergo skin
grafts or even have had limbs amputated. As with most insect stings, there are
also people who are allergic to red fire ant stings, and require immediate
hospitalisation for treatment. What causes the great fear of the red fire ants
is that most people are not usually only stung the one time. Red fire ants are
very aggressive defenders of their nests and territories and will rush to
attack any perceived threat. This could be you, one of your children or a
family pet, and the ants will swarm over you, stinging you multiple times. It
is not just the huge number of ants that is the problem, but the fact that each
individual red fire ant has the capability of stinging you several times over.
In an area heavily infested with red fire ants it is very difficult to avoid
stepping on a nest and disturbing it, as they can quite difficult to spot.
Camping in an infested area can also be a nightmare as it is very difficult to
avoid being stung, and even leaning on your own garden fence can cause the red
fire ants to swarm over you in defence of their territory. Unfortunately, there
have even been some people killed by the effects of multiple fire ant stings
and the scary reputation of these invaders has also been enhanced by some gory
urban myths and scare stories.
Red Fire Ants Go For World Domination
Once colonies of red fire ants are established in an area
they are very difficult and expensive to eradicate, and methods range from
pouring boiling water into nests, mechanically digging them out and using
chemical pesticides. Like a lot of introduced species, the red fire ants are
short on natural predators, and in killing the fire ants there is always the
risk of also destroying native species. However, red fire ants have now managed
to establish themselves in several other countries around the globe, and seem
to be bidding for world domination. There are now populations of invasive red
fire ants in Taiwan, China, Australia, New Zealand and the Caribbean, and
recently genetic experts have discovered that these invasions probably emanated
from the US. The ants probably reached these other countries as stowaways in
the cargo holds of ships, where they can survive for long periods of time. One
of their survival techniques is that if their nest is flooded, they grab the
juvenile red fire ants and grip on to each other to form a floating raft of
live ants. If the fire ants become too
hungry, they will snack on the youngsters they are carrying to survive. It has also been suggested by scientists that
during the years that the red fire ants have been invading the southern states
of the US, that the species has become hardier and have adapted to become even
more invasive and aggressive.
The red fire ant has cost the United Stated millions of
pounds in damage and destruction of crops, and a wealth of pain and fear for
people, livestock and family pets. There
are also many recreational areas that are no longer being enjoyed because of
the presence of red fire ants. But can anything be done to halt the march of
this little red invader? Or will the
rest of the world soon have to learn to live with huge ant nest mounds on their
lawns, stinging ants in their microwaves and extensive damage to their valuable
crops and property.
Sunday, 8 January 2012
Do We Know Who the Real St Valentine Was?
The US Greeting Card Association estimates that around one
billion Valentine’s cards are sent each year around the world timed to arrive
on the 14th February, a huge number that is only eclipsed by the
number of Christmas cards sent annually.
The modern phenomenon that is St Valentine’s Day is a triumph of
marketing and consumerism; a day where lovers take their partners out for meals
in restaurants where the prices have been inflated for the day and plied with
red roses, champagne, saucy lingerie, chocolates or expensive jewellery. But what are the true origins of this St
Valentine’s Day celebration?
We may view St Valentine as a saucy little cupid shooting
love’s arrows, but in a less romantic reality St Valentine was probably not
even one person. Valentine or Valentinus was the name of several saints in late
antiquity, maybe as many as fifty, who were martyred during the Roman
period. The name Valentine derives from
the Latin word ‘valens’ which means worthy and it was a fairly popular name
back in those times. One of those saints
just happened to have a feast day that fell on February 14th and it
was from this saint’s feast day that our modern celebrations for St Valentine’s
Day have evolved. Very little is known about this obscure saint except for the
fact that he was buried north of Rome on the Via Flaminia. The feast day of St Valentine was established
by Pope Gelasius I in 496 AD, and even then it seems as though very little was
known about this saint as Valentine was included in the list of those ‘...whose
names are greatly reverenced among men, but whose acts are only known to God.’
![]() |
| Silver Reliquary of St Valentine |
St Valentine does appear in several lists of martyrs or
‘martyrologies’, and he is described variously as a martyr in the Roman
province of Africa, a bishop of Interamna or as a priest in Rome. We have to wait until 1493 and the Nuremberg
Chronicle to get the first graphical representation of St Valentine and his
woodcut picture is accompanied by a text that states that he was a Roman priest
martyred during the reign of Emperor Claudius Gothicus.
Emperor Claudius was busily persecuting the Christians in
Rome at that time, and Valentine was arrested for marrying couples using the
Christian rites and helping the Christians to evade the persecution. He is said to have converted his jailer to
Christianity by miraculously restoring the sight of his daughter. Valentine befriended the jailer’s daughter
and left her a goodbye note reputedly signed ‘From Your Valentine’. According to the legend the Roman Emperor then
took a strong liking to Valentine, but he then tried to convert him to
Christianity and was condemned to death for his zeal. It is believed that he was clubbed and
stoned, but that his executioners did not manage to kill him, so they
eventually had to behead him outside of the Flaminian Gate in Rome. Various dates have been put forward for
Valentine’s martyrdom, including 269, 270 or 273 AD and in the Middle Ages two
churches were built in Rome dedicated to this St Valentine.
Relics, believed to be those of St Valentine, were exhumed
from the catacombs of St Hippolytus in 1836 and sent to the Whitefriar Street
Carmelite Church in Dublin. The casket
containing the relics are carried in procession to the church’s high altar
every February 14th for a special mass dedicated to young lovers. As relics of saints tended to be very numerous and widespread in the Middle
Ages, there are also reputed relics of St Valentine in Stephansdom in Vienna,
Roquemaure in France, the Gorbals in Glasgow and the Birmingham Oratory.
It was believed by two eighteenth century antiquarians,
Alban Butler and Francis Douce that St Valentine may have been an invention of
the early Roman Catholic Church as a means of suppressing the Roman pagan
pastoral festival of Lupercalia which was celebrated on February 15th
each year, but this theory is not universally upheld. It is believed that during this Roman
festival boys drew the names of girls to honour the goddess Februata Juno who
was a goddess of fertility and physical love.
This was repeated in the Middle Ages when youngsters would draw a name
out of a bowl to determine who their Valentine would be and then sew this name
onto their sleeve for one week. This is
where the term ‘wearing your heart on your sleeve’ comes from, meaning that you
are showing your feelings so clearly that other people easily can gauge exactly
what you are feeling.
St Valentine’s Day
first became associated with romance and love in the 14th century in
England, and many of the stories around this festival were created by the poet
Geoffrey Chaucer in his ‘Parliament of Foules’. In the ‘Parliament of Foules’ the story goes
that the birds choose their mates on February 14th, and this is what
is believed to have started the tradition of people sending letters to their
loved ones on this date. Another
romantic tradition is the one of pinning bay leaves to your pillow on St
Valentine’s Eve with the aim of dreaming of your future husband or wife. There is also a tradition that if you see a
robin flying above you on Valentine’s Day you will marry a sailor, if it was a
sparrow that you saw you would be blissfully married to a pauper and if it was
a goldfinch you would marry a very rich person.
The earliest known Valentine greeting was a rondeau written
by Charles, Duke of Orleans, addressed to his ‘valentined’ wife while he was
imprisoned in the Tower of London after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. In 1797 ‘The Young Man’s Valentine Writer’
was produced in the UK, which contained romantic verses that young men could
use for Valentine’s greetings if they were too shy or were unable to think up
their own. The nineteenth century
ushered in the mass sending of greeting cards for Valentine’s Day and the
practice of sending cards anonymously to someone that you fancied.
As there was so little information known about St Valentine,
his feast day was removed from the Roman Catholic General Calendar for
universal liturgical veneration in 1969.
However, St Valentine is not only the patron saint of lovers; his
saintly patronage extends to apiarists, greeting card manufacturers, travellers,
young people and he also offers protection from plague, epilepsy and fainting.
So while you are munching your chocolates, admiring your
diamond or sipping your champagne, spare a thought for poor St Valentine who
had to be stoned, clubbed and beheaded so that you can whisper sweet nothings
to your loved one and send soppy greetings cards on the 14th
February every year!
Saint Valentine Reliquary Image Wikimedia Commons Public Domain
Saint Valentine Reliquary Image Wikimedia Commons Public Domain
Labels:
14th February,
Roman saint,
Saint Valentine,
St Valentine,
St Valentine's Day,
Valentine,
Valentines Day
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






